Before an article is accepted for publication, this has to be reviewed by researchers employed in the field that is samereferees).

Before an article is accepted for publication, this has to be reviewed by researchers employed in the field that is samereferees).

The main characteristic of an academic or scholarly paper is before it can be published in an academic journal (the DEFSA website is an authorised ePublication) that it has to pass an academic quality assessment. This control process is named peer-reviewing and is designed to guarantee the academic standard of an article.

What exactly is an academic research paper?

An academic paper is not a social commentary, an impression or a “blog”. An academic paper begins with a thesis – the author of the academic paper is designed to persuade readers of a notion or means to fix a challenge centered on EVIDENCE – not personal opinion.

Academic writing should present your reader with an informed argument. To construct an informed argument, you have to first attempt to work through everything you know about a topic from everything you think or feel about a subject. You could begin by posing a relevant question that will lead to your idea (in which case, your idea is the answer to your question), you can also make a thesis statement. You can also do both: you can ask a question and suggest the answer immediately that your particular essay will argue.

The research process is certainly not simply collecting data, evidence, or “facts,” then copy-and-pasting” this preexisting information into a paper. Instead, the research process is approximately investigation —asking questions and developing answers through serious critical thinking and reflection that is thoughtful. Most research involve at least a study or questionnaire soliciting opinions from a reasonably-sized sample of relevant participants.

How are Academic Papers assessed?

  1. May be the Full Paper an reflection that is accurate of title, abstract and keywords?
  2. Does the paper clearly state the problem, outcomes, findings or conclusions. Could be the structure regarding the paper logical and clear?
  3. Does the paper clearly define the methodology, research tools and research questions?
  4. Does the paper include sufficient theory that is relevant is such knowledge clearly portrayed and correctly cited?
  5. Performs this paper present new knowledge or insights, and suggest future operate in the field of design education.
  6. Are any parts of the paper weak or lacking, and how could these be improved?
  7. Have ethical requirements been addressed, including the way the extensive research was conducted.
  8. Does the paper stick to the style guidelines?

In addition, papers presented at DEFSA Academic conferences are evaluated in a Double Blind Peer Review resistant to the criteria that are following

  1. Does the paper address the conference theme?
  2. Does the paper play a role in Design Education (or closely related) focus areas? It is critical to keep in mind that papers must address issues linked to design education such as for example knowledge production, curriculum, pedagogy and assessment, and not designing or perhaps the design profession.
  3. Does the paper present an academically sound argument that contributes to research output that is original?
  4. The abstract contains a summary that is short of article along with a description regarding the objective, method, result and conclusion associated with study. Keywords (or words that are subject, which identify the contents associated with article, are also given when you look at the abstract. An abstract is between 300 and 500 words.

    A Full Paper can contain as much as 5 000 words, and is comprised of the immediate following:


  5. Briefly describe the main focus for the overall paper and its main points
  6. Highlight background information or issues necessary to comprehend the direction regarding the paper. The evaluator might not be from your own field of design.
  7. Define any terminology that is key to comprehend the topic
  8. Finish with your thesis statement
  9. Research Method and material

    • The methodology and methods should be reasonable for and appropriate to that particular that is being studied.
    • Identify the methods used to identify and locate sources as well as the rationale useful for selecting the sources to analyse. The detail must certanly be sufficient so the extensive research process may be assessed, and reproduced by future researchers.
    • Give an explanation for procedures utilized for analysing the info and coming to findings.


    • Important information is given textual form preferably using tables and figures. Even unexpected or negative results are presented.


    • The discussion is an evaluation associated with results. Methodological considerations along with the method by which the outcomes compare to earlier research on the go are discussed.


    • Restate your thesis from the introduction in numerous words
    • Briefly summarise each main point found in the human body regarding the paper (1-2 sentences for every point). Give a statement associated with the consequences of not embracing the career paper that is(argumentative)
    • End with a strong clincher statement: an appropriate, meaningful final sentence that ties your whole point associated with the paper together


    • All documents mentioned into the article ought to be included in the bibliography so that the reader has the capacity to refer to the sources that are original.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *